Friday, December 30, 2011

Tebowing for a Better Way...

This weekend, we will see the last games of the NFL regular season.  Some of the games this weekend will be meaningless, and others will be pregnant with opportunity--a few teams will be able to make the post season playoffs with a win or a loss of another team or a combination of the two,


(Mother Teresa "Tebowing" for an end to poverty)

No doubt the Denver Broncos are one of the latter teams.  While the Broncos and their quarterback Tim Tebow have had some exhilarating 11th hour wins this season, they were humbled by two sizable losses last week and the week before.

Those sports reporters and social critics that were quick to dub Tebow "God's quarterback" who was performing "miracles" in football games, have been silenced by these losses, while people like Bill Maher has used the loses at an attempt to mock Tebow, God and Christians.


(Nelson Mandela "Tebowing" for unity)

Maher and others have been out of line in their recent comments about Tebow, about God and about Christians.  However, we should have anticipated them.  Calling Tebow "God's quarterback" and referring to the games he and his team have won this season as miracles has been most



(President Obama "Tebowing" for guidance)

irresponsibly done to satisify our need to have everything packaged neatly with a cute name.  You know, Jennifer Lopez can't be Jennifer Lopez, she has to be JLo.  There's a ScarJo, a Brangelina, and a KFed.  All packaged neatly with cute names.


(Dr. Martin Luther King "Tebowing" for peace)

And so when God is packaged in the form of a Denver Broncos fan and communication with that God is cutely referred to as "Tebowing," its easy to mock.  God becomes easy to mock. 

This isn't Tebow's fault.  He didn't create this mess.  I wish him well.  But I wish Tebow's humbling would teach us that there are somethings that don't need slick, cute packages or names and the Creator is on of them.

 I'm not optimistic that we will learn from Tebow, but I am Tebowing right now that we do.

Thursday, December 29, 2011

The Pope and Me...




Recently, Pope Benedict XVI articulated his support for sweeping political and social action to end the death penalty internationally.

Pope Benedict, like Pope John Paul II, has been a consistent voice against the death penalty.  He has called on governments within the United States and other countries to commute sentences of criminal offenders facing the death penalty.  Indeed, the Catholic church has been opposed to the death penalty for decades, but ramped up its opposition in the early 1990s.

The death penalty, particularly as used and applied in the United States disproportionately affects people of color, the poor, the marginalized and the disenfranchised of our community.  While there are some within fundamentalist Christian circles that have sought to justify support for the death penalty (while incidentally in the same breath vehemently opposing abortion) using Old Testament passages, any Christian support for the death penalty is contrary to every one of Jesus' teachings.

While the Catholic church is not perfect, it is refreshing to see a Christian communion standing firmly and consistently against the death penalty,

Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Playing God and Newt at the Same Time...

Recently, GOP presidential candidate Newt Gingrich signed a pledge, promising in writing that he would defend and strengthen the family and uphold the institution on marriage. 

The pact, called the Marriage Pledge, is a construct of a group called Family Leader, a socially conservative group based in Iowa.  The Family Leader has called on all 2012 GOP presidential candidates to sign the Marriage Pledge, which is, among other things, a veiled litmus test to sure up strong opposition for and of same sex marriage.  Clearly, the pledge is also a call for fidelity in marriage.  Newt has had his issues with past marriages.

But, I don't care about what Newt does with his wife or anyone else.  We have all sinned--from lying about how well someone looks, to the failure to help someone in need, to sending military troops into a war to kill.  (Yes, all of those are sins.)  No sin is more egregious than another.

But, what is troubling about this pledge is this:  all of the GOP presidential candidates are married and call themselves Christians.  By accepting Christ as their savior and reciting wedding vows, they have already made the Pledge to the entity that matters.  You know, the Creator.  Newt, the other GOP presidential candidates, and the rest of us for that matter are only answerable to the Creator for how we construe marriage.

Defining the terms or construct of marriage is wholly the job of the creator, not the Family Leader.  Why don't we just let the Creator do the Creator's job.  She has it covered.

Monday, December 12, 2011

I'm Not on Tebow's Jock Just Yet...

This weekend, Tim Tebow and the Denver Bronco's beat the Chicago Bears 13-10 in overtime.  The Bronco's field goal kicker, Matt Prater, kicked a 51 yard field goal in overtime to secure the game for the Bronco's.

That was it.  The Bronco's won another mediocre game over another faltering team (the Bears' were without their starting quarterback and running back due to injuries).

But, the better story, the angle that's far more attractive, is that Tebow is winning and giving the credit to God.  Actually, that story isn't even sexy enough--you know, a humble football player who gives thanks to the Creator for the ability to play football and such. 

But, saying that God is actually making Tebow win, is a far more attractive story.  It allows sports reporters and marketers to come up with cute names for Tebow like, the "Mile High Messiah," or "God's Quarterback."  (Remember, what happened to the Dallas Cowboys when they were dubbed "God's Team?"  I'm just saying.)

Christians know that God intercedes on our behalf and protects us and comforts us.  Christians also know and believe in the power of prayer--that through prayer all things can become possible.  But Christians also know that the Creator provides blessings and prosperity for the just as well as the unjust.  Matthew 5:45.

Tebow is winning for sure.  He also appears to be sincere with his faith, humble to a fault, and even careful with how he characterizes his win streak.

But, I prefer to believe that the Creator isn't in the business of fixing professional football games against and between marginal teams.  Tebow's win streak is no miracle.

But it sure sounds good.

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Mid-Week Meditation: The Continuum of Sin...

With the rise and fall and rise and fall of Herman Cain, and the rise and fall and apparent rise again of Tiger Woods, the fall and fall of Bishop Long and the whatever Jerry Sandusky is doing this week (he can't even lie for the camera and say that he's not attracted to boys), I have been meditating on sin.

Clearly, a continuum of sin exists in our spiritual and even secular cultures--some sins are more egregious than others. I don't have it all figured out, this continuum we have, but as near as I can tell, it works something like this:

At one end of the continuum are what we'll call the "Oprah offenses"--adultery, domestic violence, and the emotional abuse of a partner or spouse. There are no offenses more repugnant in our culture than these sins, called Oprah offenses because, Oprah spent much of her career railing against these sins.

Just under those sins are sins against children and the otherwise helpless. On this place of the continuum, we place child molesters and mothers who kill, neglect or mistreat their kids. Casey Anthony and Jerry Sandusky live here.

Next on the continuum is, the killing, mistreating, or otherwise causing pain to an attractive, productive woman of European descent...if you are not of European descent. Ask O.J. Simpson why he's doing a 10-year bit for trying to take back property that was stolen from him.

Messing with someone's cheddar who matters in this society is next on the continuum. If Bernie Madoff Ponzied prison inmates or the people who love them, he wouldn't need protection in prison because he wouldn't be there. But he did not. Madoff bilked professionals and people who vote and pay taxes and write fundraising checks to senators.  He had to do some time.

Mistreating animals...In some sections of our culture, this is above the Oprah offenses.

Selling drugs, killing for self-defense, drunk driving and engaging in war seem to be a bit lower on the continuum. 

There are certainly other sins, of which I am unsure of their placement on the continuum, but this is what I have gleaned from years of listening and reading.

When the Apostle Paul proclaimed in Romans 6:23 "that the wages of sin is (sic) death, but the gift of God is eternal life through Christ", is this what he meant? Can a continuum of sin (I may have sinned in this way, but at least I didn't do what he did. He's disgusting) that is consistent with Paul's pronouncement that all sin is punishable by death without Christ checking it in?

Monday, December 5, 2011

Praying for Tiger...



I have been quietly waiting for the opportunity to write this post for over two years. 

This past weekend, Tiger Woods won the Chevron World Challenge golf tournament, ending a drought of almost 30 winless tournaments over two years.  He has made strong showings in several golf tournaments, including the 2011 President's Cup, but wins have eluded Tiger for some time.

We know the trouble Tiger has been in.  We know about the divorce.  We know about the porn stars and the side pieces.  We know about the hush money Tiger gave to all of them and we know the sex rehab center he went to because of all of the trouble he was in.  Let us not rehash it.

It has been most interesting over the past two years to watch people watch Tiger.  His friends and enemies alike have fallen away from him.  Sports writers and golfers who lived in Tiger's chilly shadow for years, made a point to attack him about his personal failings whenever they got a chance to do so publicly. 

Even his closest friend, his long time caddie, a guy Tiger heaped millions of dollars on for almost two decades, took some racially insensitive and tasteless shots at Tiger while Tiger has been down.

They, wallowing in self-righteousness, hurled "I told you so's" and "He's troubled and sick," as if they didn't know that Tiger would make a comeback, rise from the ashes and win tournaments; find a way to make people love him again.

It all reminds me of how friends and family of Christ fell away from Christ and betrayed Him just before He was crucified, not knowing or at least not fully believing that Christ would rise from His grave and make His Ascension.  That had to be a lonely place for Christ in those moments, but He was comforted by prayer and meditation to the Creator.

I am not calling Tiger Christ, but it appears that a healthier Tiger is on his way back.  While many have fallen away, I for one, am praying and meditating for his well being.

Sunday, December 4, 2011

Oh, Christmas Tree...Oh, Really?

As we approach the third Sunday of Advent, and as we begin the Christmas season in earnest, the heated "Christmas tree" debate is becoming salient...again.  In just about every corner of the country, citizens, politicians and religious leaders are fighting to name the tree that pops up this time of the year one thing or another.

Some want trees that appear in state capitals, governors' mansions and other public places, to be called "holiday trees."  Naturally, these people want to use politically inclusive language for the tree as many people of many faiths with be celebrating, holidays at this time.

Others (the perpetually offended) want to call the trees "Christmas trees."  These people say they believe that a tree decorated and displayed around this time of year, is unmistakably a Christmas tree, and any attempt to call it anything else, is pandering to the politically correct forces in this country and "taking Christ out of Christmas."

While I can appreciate their concern for wanting to protect Christ, Christ doesn't need any help keeping himself in the celebration of His birthday.

We know from a careful reading of historical context and the scriptures, that Christ was neither born on December 25th or even in the winter for that matter.  It is more likely that Christ was born in the fall between September or October.

What's more, there is nothing "Christ-like" about "Christmas trees."  Not only are the scriptures void of any mention of a tree in or around the birth of Christ, every single story about the origin of the Christmas tree has pagan roots, so to speak.

And, after decades of Black Friday shootings, Santa Clauses, reindeer, Frosty the Snowmen and other gimmicks designed move our attention away from the reason we celebrate Christmas, we still acknowledge Christ this time of year and we know that Christ breathes charity and loving kindness into this holiday season.

So while I'm sure Christ appreciates their efforts to protect Him, I think He has this whole Christmas season covered.

Politicians and religious leaders should use their time living the gospel of Christ--an endless, perpetual fight for the marginalized--rather than try to score political points with this issue.

Friday, December 2, 2011

Why We Must Be Careful With Herman Cain...

I have been praying that I could stay out of the Herman Cain discourse altogether.  I have 99 problems of my own, and Herman Cain ain't one.  But, I think the discourse is heading in the wrong direction, so I should probably say something now before all of his accusers get reality TV shows.

Clearly, in the blogosphere, the tweet and Facebook universe, and even in the traditional print media, it has become trendy and most acceptable to ride out on Herman Cain.  He is an individual in an unfortunate position, and it is easy for us to pile on criticism when a person is down.  At the hands of bloggers, Herman Cain is anything from a dog, to a cheater, to an ordained minister possessed with a lustful spirit...all before we have seen any of his accusers show and prove he did anything wrong.

Now, it would be most foolhardy of me to articulate an opinion on whether or not Herman Cain did any or all of the things of which he is accused.  I have not seen any evidence and I don't know the man well enough to do that.  But, it seems to me that we owe Herman Cain some deference or at least silence for now.  Here's why:

Professionals of color who have made their way in this world are roundly attacked for one reason or another.  I'm not saying there is some vast conspiracy, or coordinated effort to attack them, it is just so.  In fact, I know of know professional of color who has a love affair with the media or the public.  Let me illustrate what I mean.

The attacks are packaged in one of three ways.  First, professionals of color have their color used against them, even if they never actually mention their color themselves.  Here, professionals of color are marginalized and can only speak about "diversity" issues, are implicitly called different and therefore bad because of their color, or they have their color taken out of context. 

For example, Lani Guinier, for years was called a "quota queen" for her efforts to discuss the voting rights of minorities.  Justice Sotamayor was flogged over and over about her "wise Latina" remarks.  And of course, President Obama has been fighting to prove he's not an African Muslim since he has been on the national scene.

The second way attacks of professionals of color are packaged is their professional acumen is called into question--they are called incompetent boobs.  "He is flash and no substance," "he gives great speeches, but he's an empty suit," "or he's a 'community organizer'" are all examples of this.

And finally, professionals of color are attacked with their sexuality.  Men are seen as over-sexed monsters, who are hungry for lustful encounters.  Women are either seen as asexual (think Aunt Jemima) or vamps who seduce any and everything with money (think every actress of color working today...)

Now, as I said, I can't say what Herman Cain has done or not done.  But it does look like he is an otherwise successful man, who is being attacked with this playbook.  Attacking Cain because it is easy and popular (Black Republicans are easy targets for ridicule, I get it) has broader implications. 

What happens when the next Herman Cain (a Herman Cain whom we actually agree with politically) steps up to make her way in this world?  Will she be oversexed, or undersexed?  Will she be all flash and no substance? Will she be the wise Latina?

Thursday, December 1, 2011

Rosa, Rosa...

File:Rosaparks.jpg


Today, we acknowledge the life and bravery of Rosa Parks.  The story of her curage is legendary.  On December 1st, 1955, a tired Rosa Parks sat down in a seat on a bus in Montgomery, Alabama.  As the bus became crowded, the driver of the bus asked Parks to give up her seat for a white passenger.  Naturally she refused, and Parks' refusal to give up her seat spurred what we now know as the Montgomery Bus Boycott and eventually, the Civil Rights era in the United States.

We know that Parks was not the first person in this country or internationally, to engage in civil disobedience, but her actions were forward-thinking, radical and enveloped in and with the notions of humanness and equality.  She made this country think about the manner in which it treats all of its citizens.

And, by the way, she was a faithful memeber of the African Methodist Episcopial church. 

As we celebrate the spirit of Rosa Parks, let us, particularly those in the A.M.E. church, remember her by keeping the same forward-thinking spirit in dealing with issues of salience today.  


 

Mid-Week Meditation: Organized Religion and Interracial Dating

Recently, a church, voted to ban interracial couples from church.  

I meditated on this story and then I asked a friend of mine if she believed in organized religion.  She told me that she wanted to, but she didn't.  I didn't bother to ask any follow up questions like, "Why not?" or "What happened?"  I didn't ask because I knew, sadly what her issue was.

My friend, like many people my age, grew up attending mass regularly because it was the right thing to do and because her parents wanted her to.  But as she got older, I assume that she felt what many of us have observed--a disconnect between church attendance and a connection to the creator, or anything else that would personally benefit her spiritually or otherwise.

The first century church was established for two reasons--as a place for believers to worship God and as a gathering place for believers to to find security.  Naturally, the first century Roman Empire was not a kind place for Christians.  They were literally persecuted and marginalized.  Gathering at church with other souls who were in the same boat, provided comfort and sanctuary.

Today, while we have some difficulties in our lives, we are in a better place than first century Christians...at least theoretically.  We have access to the government, access to the economic structure and Christianity is, in essence, the official religion of this country.  What's more, we can worship and contemplate on the works of the Creator and the creation in our own comfortable homes.  The scriptures do not mandate that a person must attend church regularly or at all to be in good stead with the Creator.

So convening in church for the same reasons first century believers did are not persuasive for the 40 and under crowd.  So they have stayed away from organized religion.

And churches that vote to ban interracial couples from worshipping does little to help attract that demographic either.

 

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Wyclef to Foundation Donors: Your Money's Gone 'til November...or Forever


This week, the New York Post released a report that claims singer, hip hop artist and composer, Wyclef Jean, used chunks of money from his charity, Yele Haiti, for his own benefit.  Specifically, the Post says that while Wyclef's organization received some $16 million in donations shortly after a hurricane struck Haiti in January 2010, only $5.1 million was actually spent on relief efforts, while millions were given to contractors with ties to Wyclef or businesses that never actually existed.

Wyclef is a very talented hip hop artist and composer.  He has revolutionized creativity in hip hop.  He has managed his career with an eye on longevity, undertaking thoughtful projects and collaborations on his albums.

However, clearly his charity, even by his own admission, has been mismanaged since its inception in 2005.  The charity has a track record of loosing money, failing to file proper financial reports and statements, and keeping the transparency charities and foundations doing the work Wyclef's claims to be doing should have.

I also acknowledge that it was in very poor taste for Wyclef to show up immediately after the hurricane, in a tailored suit and limousine while the citizen wallowed in squalor. 

However, with all of that said, Wyclef's charity isn't the first charity that is poorly run.  A vast majority of charities only direct a third (which is what Wyclef's charity spent on direct relief efforts) of the funds they raise on direct relief.  In fact, a charity that directs about 60 percent of its funds to direct relief, a well-run charity organization.

Which means that the problem is systemic.  Charities, even well-intentioned ones, are not directing all of their funds to direct relief for one reason or another.

So, why is Wyclef's charity under, what I consider an unusual amount of scrutiny for its mismanagement?  I understand that it's noteworthy, but why is Wyclef's organization the subject of an exclusive New York Post report and article, when there are so many other poorly managed charities that should be scrutinized?

Sunday, November 27, 2011

Beauty is Only In Deep...

I enjoy the work of children’s author Dr. Seuss. While I have been reading his books since I was young, I have gained an even deeper appreciation and respect for them as I read them to my children. In fact, there was a period of time when my children were much younger, that due to the demands of my schedule, that’s all I was able to read.


When I would read Dr. Seuss books with my children, I noticed that they do a few things about the books. They are revolutionary. First, they revolutionized children’s books and how they handled grammar and language. Until Dr. Seuss, children’s books were unimaginative: Dick, Spot and Jane. Go spot go. See Spot run. Run Spot run. Dr. Seuss, who wrote his books in the 1960s and 1970s, changed all that and made reading very fun and imaginative for kids. Where would our culture be without Green eggs and ham? How could we live without Ziffer-Zoffs, Foona Lagonas, Honking Hinkle Horns? And would we be as happy and joyful as a society, if we didn’t know either Thing 1 or Thing 2?

The other thing I noticed was how weighted or heavy the topics of the book were. Seuss revolutionized the subject matter of children books. Before they were about baseball, and mom going grocery shopping, or dad coming home from work. Seuss took on topics like globalization, pollution, the economy, tyranny, marginalization, all through children’s books.

One book, The Sneetches, even tackles racism, materialism, and prejudices. For those who have never read the book, Sneetches are a fictional race of beings in a fictional land. There are two kinds or races of Sneetches—those with stars on their bellies, and those without.

In this fictional world, the reader learns that there is little difference between the two groups. However, that doesn’t stop the Sneetches from distinguishing themselves. The reader is supposed to know that the Sneetches with stars on their bellies were considered generally superior to their non-star-bellied counterparts.

So the Sneetches without stars were on the outside of the society looking in. They longed and longed for stars on their bellies to be on the inside. And not too long after their wishes, along comes a guy named, Slyvester McMonkey McBean who has created a machine to capitalize on their misery. The machine puts stars on Sneetches without stars on their bellies. So the Sneetches without got stars. And they were happy and went to go show off their stars to the ones with stars originally had them. And the ones with stars on their bellies originally, were besides themselves, and so they wished to have no stars to distinguish themselves from the other Sneetches. And so along comes McMonkey McBean and he has a machine to take advantage of those Sneetches too. He sends those Sneetches through that machine as well to take off their stars.

So, as you can imagine, they keep going through the various machines until they all are broke except McBean. But, in this exercise,  they realize that they are all the same, and all it cost them was all their money.

Now, in the Biblical context there are plenty examples of people struggling with the same issues as the Sneetches were struggling with, but none quite as clear as the scripture today.

 In Acts 3, we find such an example.
The passage begins with Peter and John heading into the Temple for prayers. All pious and worthy Jews could enter the Temple to pray at 3pm. They would enter into the Temple by one of several gates—all of them had adjectives for names: everlasting, Righteous, and so on.

As Peter and John are heading into the Temple to pray, they encounter a man who could not walk from birth at the gate begging for money. What we are supposed to know is that Rev. Peter and John are pious as are the people who are heading into the Temple for prayer. We are also supposed to know that the man is not pious as he is not heading in to pray. In fact, in Ancient Jewish tradition, people with handicaps could not be considered clean or pious and were not allowed to pray in the Temple. However, “pious” people were liberal with there money on the way in the Temple. (How some Christians are good when they come to church but lack that giving spirit in other aspects of their lives.)

So the man was there at the Temple gate called Beautiful asking Peter and Paul for money. There is nothing of interpretive value in the gate being called Beautiful except that we note its irony in the story. Here we have a gate called the adjective beautiful and what was going on, a handicapped, man having to ask for money was not the least bit beautiful.

This must have been his thing though. His thing must have been to ask for money, and get it from people going to the temple, going to pray to ease their conscious. And while he would get money there at the gate, make no mistake, the man was marginalized. He was on the outside looking in like the Sneetches.

But instead of McBean, he gets Peter and John. And he asks them for money. And Peter and John look at the man and force him to look at them in the eyes. Peter says, “Look at us” and then he says “silver and gold I have not, but what I have I give to you.” Then Peter took him by the hand and said “in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, walk.” And the man got up and went into the Temple walking, jumping, shouting and praising God. And the people were astonished at this sight.

Peter took a man who was, from birth, disenfranchised and marginalized from the society of Jews who made his living begging and in one turn, he was healed and able to be in the community. He gave him a star on his belly. Made him beautiful.

Naturally, this has salvation undertones. The man’s healing by Peter clearly symbolizes that God’s salvation is available to all, not just those who can walk or look a certain way.

This story means something to us as well. In our society and culture, there are many people and groups on the outside looking in, hoping to get in, hoping to get a piece of the American Dream. Women, handicapped, and the imprisoned know what that feels like. But, the Creator has made us beautiful.

Friday, November 25, 2011

GOP to OBAMA: "You Don't mention God Enough"

Well, I thought I was finished mentioning Republicans for the week, but this one is worth it.

The president, President Obama, (I have been reading Fox News and they call him everything but that, so if I don't say it, I'll forget he his the president and not some degenerate. libertine anti-Christ) is again the focus of conservative rage.

This time the rage is over President Obama's weekly Internet address.  This week, naturally, the president's remarks focused on Thanksgiving and all of the things for which he was thankful.  As most other people, the president was thankful for, among other things, loved ones, for people who served this country and the community at large, and the ability for Americans to determine their destiny.  At the end of the Internet address, the president asked God to bless the people watching the Internet address.  For good measure, the president explicitly thanked God in remarks earlier in the week.

Well, all of this thanking God by the president isn't enough for conservative talkers.  They have called President Obama a "turkey" because he didn't mention God at all or enough in his remarks this week.

Now, I am all for spirituality in the White House and I know that our leaders need guidance from Spirit to make compassionate, thoughtful decisions, so I can't be mad at people listening to hear our president thank God in a Thanksgiving address. 

But, I don't understand the conservative outrage about the president's remarks.  He did invoke God in his Internet address and earlier in the week thanked God.  How many more times does he need to say God to please his critics?  Yea, these are the same people who still believe he's a Muslim who was born in Africa or the ocean or wherever.

What is more, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum issued Thanksgiving statements from their respective campaigns that omitted any references to God.  And what's even more, our last president thanked God and then told us that Iraq was store housing weapons of mass destruction and then sent thousands of American troops to the country, a good chunk of whom would never return home.

President Obama is not perfect.  He has made a few missteps in his presidency (all of which he has owned up to, incidentally).  However, failing to invoke God's name or thank God this Thanksgiving, isn't one of those missteps. 

Surely, the president's critics can gain more steam by focusing on one of those issues...can't they?

The Newt Immigration Plan

It's been a good few weeks for Newt Gingrich.  With the political and personal stumbles of the resilient Herman Cain, and social conservative activists secretly huddling to thwart Mitt Romney's presidential hopes, Gingrich has surged in recent polls.  He is, by most accounts now considered the republican frontrunner.

In this past Tuesday's Republican presidential debate,  the new Republican front runner, took some of his time in the spotlight to articulate his position on immigration reform.  Calling for a more humane position on immigration by the Republican Party and the country, Gingrich said, "I don't see how the party that says it's the party of the family is going to adopt an immigration policy which destroys families that have been here a quarter of a century. And I'm prepared to take the heat for saying, 'let's be humane in enforcing the law without giving them citizenship but by finding a way to create legality so that they are not separated from their families." 

Gingrich then articulated several factors that would make a person eligible for his immigration amnesty of sorts.  He said that if a person has been in the country for a quarter century, works and pays taxes, and is active in a local church, they deserve immigration leniency.

I am extremely happy to hear this bold stance taken by a front runner in the Republican presidential race.  It is in fact humane and quite daring and courageous of Gingrich to say this just ahead of the Iowa caucuses where his conservative credentials will be scrutinized.  I applaud Gingrich for his statements and hope they help create the kind of real immigration reform the country needs.

However, and I hate to nitpick, but I couldn't help notice that in Gingrich's articulation of the factors a person must have to receive leniency under his immigration plan, the person must be active in a local church.  What about those who are active in a mosque or temple or synagogue?  Where do they stand under Gingrich's immigration plan?  Would they be allowed to stay here, or is his plan only for Christians?

Thursday, November 24, 2011

Thank you God...For Nothing

It is Thanksgiving.  Naturally, there will be many tweets, emails, blogs, articles and Facebook updates about all the things that we are thankful for.  There will be prayers at the dinner table and quiet reflection about all of the wonderful things that God has done for people this year.

There will be speeches and interviews of politicians and statesmen who will say, earnestly even, that they are thankful for one thing or another.  And religious and community leaders will show that they are thankful to God for the things that God has done for them, by serving dinner to the marginalized today.

Thanksgiving is a beautiful holiday in that respect--it reminds thoughtful people to be thankful to the Creator for the Creator's blessings. 

While we should be thankful for all of the good things the Creator has done for us,  Matthew 5:45 reminds us that the Creator provides the same blessings--sunshine, rain, wealth, plenty--for the just, as well as the unjust.

So even when we reflect on this year and can't point to anything great that happened (or the down times that we are thankful or because the creator uses those to prepare us for greater work), we should still be thankful.  We should be thankful simply because we have a relationship with the creator and that while we are intelligent beings, some of the things that happen in this universe will always pass our understanding.  And that's just fine with me.

This Thanksgiving, if I am called on to say what I'm thankful for, I could pull a Mary J. Blige and thank everyone from God and Jesus, to my mix tape guy.  But I won't do that.  What I am thankful for, what I am really thankful for is that Spirit saw fit to not give me everything I ever wanted, even when I begged and pleaded and prayed for those things.  Even when I wanted them desperately.  I am thankful that Spirit was kind enough to withhold those things from me, because they probably would have caused endless pain.

In other words, I thank God for nothing.

Wednesday, November 23, 2011

Mid-Week Meditation: What if God was One of Us...

I was on a run yesterday morning when I heard the Joan Osborne's song, "One of Us," a rhetorical pondering of God's identity.  "What if God was one of us," Osborne chants, "Just a slob like one of us.  Just a stranger on the bus trying to make his way home."

Osborne is a meaty, heavy (I mean substantive.  Geez.  How in the world did these terms become bad ones?)  soul singer.  She has real staying power in the music industry, but perhaps without "One of Us," the popular culture and the hipsters alike would have nothing to do with her.  So, I accept the song for what it is--a carefully packaged appeal to the spiritual questions of the masses, without being too preachy or religious.

I appreciate what the song does and I assume that when she asks the question about God being one of us, she means it in the Matthew 25:31-46 manner:

“Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’
“Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink?  When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’

“The King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’"

I assume she means her question in this context because, we know that God was one of us in the form of Jesus.  And we also know that, as Osborne's song laments, He was not treated favorably by many.  I believe that not much has changed.  If Christ came to one of our churches, we would still treat Him unfavorably because He didn't have on a suit, or the right shoes, or didn't have the right shave and haircut and couldn't prove His prominence within the community.

Several years ago, I asked a few people I knew to stop by my church and sit in the back for service over the span of a few weeks.  Some had criminal records, some were not wealthy and some were not dressed in church gear.  I asked them to stop by, not to test people in the pew, but simply to have the people stop by enjoy the worship service.  I found that without exception, the people that I asked to attend were treated uniformly--they were treated well, but with kid gloves, as if they had done something wrong by simply stopping by for worship service. 

My church is as warm a place to worship as you can find.  But, if Christians are to, as the scriptures call on us to do, treat everyone as if we were entertaining God, then we have a considerable amount of work to do.

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Why We All Should Care About the Duggars...

I have fond memories of my grandparents.  When they were alive many years ago when I was a teenager, they would spend winters up north with my family.  My grandparents were from the south, and like many in the rural south, they were agrarian.

My grandparents' lifestyle called on them to have enough children to help them with their farm work.  They had eight.  My grandparents continued to stress to me in my teenage years, that while they loved all their children, they had so many children not out of vanity, or a need for excess, but out of necessity.  I hesitate to speak for my dear grandparents, but I have to believe that if they were raising a family today, they wouldn't have so many children.  It's just unnecessary for many reasons.

Recently, the Duggars, Jim Bob and Michelle, have announced that they are expecting their 20th child.  For the few of you who don't know the Duggars, they are a family of Christian fundamentalists who have a reality TV show on TLC.  For their part, the Duggars appear to be a close family, with solid values, well-mannered children, and a sense of humor.

I cannot do the Duggars' faith full justice in the space that I have, but it is clear that one of the things they believe is that they can become closer to God by having more children.  If this is true, if the Duggars can become closer to God by having more children, then God must live next door to them.  In fact, God should be so close to the Duggar family, they probably need a restraining order against God.

Now, I refuse to belittle the Duggars' faith--it's actually quite admirable that they believe so strongly in something.  But, I also refuse to believe that having 20 children is the pathway to a closer relationship to God.  Mother Teresa, Jesus and the Apostle Paul all seemed to do just fine with the Creator and had no children at all.

Where I'm going with all of this is here:  having 20 children in 2011 is not only not necessary like it was in my grandparents' time and space, it can be seen as an opulent display not afforded to many in this country or many others.  In an age where the earth's population has hit seven billion and many country's have laws governing the amount of the children a family can have, willfully having 20 children against this back drop when its not a necessity, is the equivalent of burning money in a fleet of yachts in front of very poor people.

Having 20 children is perhaps a way to establish a closer relationship with God for the Duggars.  But, the rest of us who know that the earth is overpopulated and has finite resources, should probably stick to the more traditional ways to get closer to the Creator like prayer, meditation and fasting.

Friday, November 18, 2011

What Would 'Jesus' do?

In the mid-1990s, a faction of Christians popularized the saying, "What would Jesus do" which was shortened (to better market on T-shirts and bracelets) to WWJD.  The question, perhaps based on a group of scriptures as well as the sermon series of a 20th century evangelical preacher, is not without its merit.  As a general proposition, we can keep ourselves out of trouble (but perhaps not out of perpetual conflict with authority) if we ask ourselves that question before we act.

I suppose that's a fine question to ask yourself if you're a regular human.  However, what do you do when you are Jesus Christ?   Who do you model your behavior after?  Well, if you are Jesus, whom the government, the criminal justice system and the Washington Post know better as Oscar Ramiro Ortega-Hernandez, you do a few things. 

First, you make an open casting call scrawling rambling manifestoish video to Oprah, establishing that you are Christ and then begging Oprah to put you on one of her shows (Is this how Gail got put on?).  Then, you  go to hell, better known as the White House in D.C. and then you lazily attempt to kill the devil, also known as President Obama.

You follow that?

Now, in the course of history, many people have claimed to be Christ, which I get--some have been charismatic, others have been brutal, and still more have been downright creepy.  Being Christ makes the words you speak carry a certain authority in some circles. 

But, in a look at all of the people who have claimed to be Christ over the years, Ortega is the only I know of who believes that part of his ministry is to beg to get on one of Oprah's shows.

That is apparently what Jesus would do in 2011.

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Mid-Week Meditation

In their love letter to all things hippie, "Mrs. Robinson," Simon and Garfunkel ask the question, "Where have you gone Joe DiMaggio..."  The song writing pair wrote the song for the movie, "The Graduate" to accent the motifs of the movie--all of which revolved around the notion of the need to question societal norms and conventions...and seducing young men.

The line in the song about Joe DiMaggio was intended to spark nostalgia for the sturdy, dependable hero of the past.  The kind of hero who was consistent and downright and forthright and upright.  The kind of hero who was so reliable you could set your watch by him.

Well, these days, as I watch Joe Paterno, an otherwise sturdy hero fall in the Penn State sex abuse scandal, I'm beginning to think it's too much to ask for sturdy old Joe DiMaggio.  Right now, I'd take a Joe Nucksal, a Joe Montana, or even the last guy who made wearing fur coats cool, Joe Namath.

The outrage about the scandal has been sweeping and justified.  Paterno sheltered, enabled and coddled an accused child rapist, Jerry Sandusky, for about a decade.  Paterno, by almost all accounts was made aware that Sandusky was possibly engaged in very violent criminal behavior with children.  Rather than firing Sandusky, or going to the authorities about his behavior, or just punching him in the nose, Paterno did...nothing. 

Hardly, the actions of a hero.   Where have you gone Joe DiMaggio indeed.

While "Mrs. Robinson" does ask where the sturdy leaders like Joe DiMaggio have gone, the song answers its own question when it says, "Jesus loves you more than you will know..."

Of course.  In an age where all of our leaders without exception have been smothered under the weight of their own humanness, we are reminded that Christ and His spotless character and ability to walk in loving kindness has never been contradicted.  We might say He's the last sturdy hero.




 

Thursday, November 10, 2011

The Best Things in Life...



I enjoy driving to church. On Sunday mornings, the roads are quiet, nobody’s rushing and I can drive and think and meditate. It's peaceful. There is no controversy or drama on the way to church, and while the drive takes slightly longer (only slightly) than it takes a woman from Herman Cain's past to jump out of the woodwork to accuse him of misconduct, it is one of the best parts of my week.

Which is why I was tickled recently when my peaceful journey to church was broken up, interrupted even, by blunt ignorance. The other day, the other Sunday, I was driving to church next to a fellow in a weathered, rustic pickup truck. As he passed me, I noticed that he had a bumper sticker in the back window of his truck that said, "Gas, grass or ass...nobody rides for free."

As you can probably imagine, the fellow's passenger seat was empty. I laughed out loud at the fellow, the empty seat and the bumper sticker (it all missed ironic by just a hair). It could have been a singular coincidence--with the exception of that Sunday, the fellow normally has someone in the passenger seat of his car giving liberally of one or all of the items his bumper sticker indicated would suffice as car fare. However, more likely, he was riding alone, as he perhaps often does because the people close to the guy don't want to feel like every interaction with him is a transaction.

All too often, our churches take a position toward its congregants that is similar to the fellow with the bumper sticker. Oh, we may not have bumper stickers that are as brash as the one above, but the message is the same: if you are sitting in the pew for worship, or Bible study, or otherwise using the church's resources, you must provide something of extrinsic worth. If you do not, you are not welcome.

I have seen with my own eyes, pastors of churches tell people who are not tithing to sit down and be still so they wouldn't block God's blessings to people in the church who do tithe. I have witnessed pastors tell individuals who say they do not have a monetary offering for a worship service but would like to donate their time singing or working in the food pantry, that the kind of offering they have is not "Biblical"--that they must bring a monetary offering. I have seen scores of people silenced or sequestered from church leadership, because they have little or no money to give.

This isn't my manifesto against tithing. People should give of their time, talents and whatever money they can comfortably and cheerfully give to build Spirit's kingdom. However, church is the last place that people should feel like they are perpetually a part of a transaction--that they have to give in order to exist, worship and serve in the church.

One of my favorite show tunes has a line that goes something like: "The moon belongs to everyone. The best things in life are free..." Now, you all know that I believe in the infallibility of both the Bible and the Broadway show tune. But, shouldn't we be able to add church and worship as some of the best things in life that are free also?




Friday, October 28, 2011

Pint-Sized Preachers






Recently, I saw a young man called Kanon Tipton on a few news programs with his parents.  Kanon, for those of you who missed his rounds on the news shows, is a third generation preacher of the gospel. 

No problem there, right?  Spirit moving through generations of families is common. 

However, Master Kanon Tipton is four years old.  Yes, four.  At an age where kids are developing their fine motor skills, learning how to socialize with other children and how throw temper tantrums after an afternoon nap, he is preaching the gospel...and people are not only listening to him, they are really listening to him.

I watched video footage of the young man preaching and he is certainly charismatic, engaging and has a passion for the gospel.  And his parents, to their credit seem to acknowledge that while God has touched their child, some of Tipton's preaching is actually him simply mimicking his father and other people he has seen preach the gospel.

Don't worry.  I'm not going to ride out on a four year old.  Tipton seems to be honest and sincere in his endeavor to preach the gospel.  What's more, the Bible is full of people called to the ministry in their youth.  We know that Jesus was preaching in and around temples at 12.  Mary was around 16 when she was pregnant with Jesus.  Samuel, David and Daniel were all very young when God called them.

So, I get that God can call young people for kingdom building.  But, usually Spirit calls people because they have experiences that help illustrate Spirit's greatness.  Take the Apostle Paul for instance.  He was a zealous persecutor of Christians, a Roman citizen and also Jewish.  Spirit converted Paul and used him to illustrate, among other principles, the concept of redemption--that someone can be moving in the wrong direction for a very long time, and with Spirit's help, immediately move in the right direction and do great work.

Now, I don't know Tipton.  I'm sure he has a bright future and time will tell what his ministry is all about.  I am interested, however, to hear or see why Spirit called him.






Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Mid-Week Meditation: The Audience of Worship...

Every so often, I try to visit others as they gather to worship.  I do so because it is good get out of my primary place of worship to worship with others.  I have found that I can learn a great deal about people when I see them in their respective worship communities.  For most people, church or temple is the place in which they can "be themselves," whatever that term means.  It is also good to witness diverse worship styles and services.

Recently, I attended a church's anniversary celebration in the city in which I live.  Like my church, the church is within the African Methodist Episcopal communion.  On this occasion, the presiding bishop of the episcopate of which the church is connected, was in attendance (he actually was the speaker for the program), as was the bishop of another communion.  He happens to also be my presiding bishop as well.

The effort to secure the bishop of an episcopacy within the AME church for a program in our city was not lost on me.  In a city where some local churches have two or three bishops in their pulpits, getting a "bishop" to attend a local church function is perhaps easy.  However, bishops in the AME communion (or any communion with an episcopal structure) oversee 400-500 churches in various regions and countries.  They have unfathomable travel and preaching schedules and are always busy doing Spirit's work.

Securing the attendance of the bishop I am amenable to is particularly notable.  While he is accessible to a fault, he is very well liked, has a national profile, and even advises the president on spiritual matters.

What is more, his words, his ministry and his actions--by all accounts--align so that he is not a walking contradiction, but rather the model of a kingdom builder and poor righteous teacher (Five Percenters, let me have this one, just this time).

I will get ribbed for gushing about another man this way, but he gives me goosebumps whenever I hear him speak.

At this church anniversary, I was listening to my bishop speak, I reflected on how many individuals were there simply to see him speak or to wish the church well on their anniversary.  I reflected on how careful the bishop was to keep the attention of the audience off him and on Spirit and the scriptures he was exegeting.  It was most impressive to witness.

Ultimately, the anniversary made me reflect on the hundreds of thousands of worship services that occur weekly just in this country alone.  I have heard many individuals say that they are attending a worship service or church to get "fed" spiritually.  Conversely, I have heard many of the same individuals say they have moved from a church or chosen not to participate in a worship service because they are not getting "fed" spiritually.

Is getting fed spiritually the point of worship on Saturdays or Sundays?  Is an individual's need to receive encouragement, spiritual nourishment, or a more profound understanding of the scriptures, the point of worship?  Is only coming to a worship service if we receive something out of it the point of worship?  To be sure, clergy who lead worship will be accountable to Spirit if worship services are not also nourishing for the pew.  But, it seems to me that, worship by definition, has very little to do with us getting fed spiritually, but rather paying reverence to God and Spirit. 

We can get fed at a potluck or Bible study...

Friday, September 23, 2011

MLK: "Everyday I'm Hustlin'"


Did you hear the one about the pastor-turned-civil-rights-leader who was a sex-crazed, hustling phony?  Yea, it sounds more like the first part of a joke so corny, Jay Leno wouldn't even touch it.

But, that's apparently what Jacqueline Kennedy thought of Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.  In conversations she had with friends and interviewers months after her husband, President John F. Kennedy's assassination, she revealed that she believed King was a phony and vile man.

What is more, it appears that FBI director J. Edgar Hoover, shared surveillance with Jacqueline Kennedy--wire taped conversations purportedly of King laughing about the Kennedy assassination and calling women and men when he came to the Washington D.C. area for orgies.  The actual surveillance is currently protected by court order and will not be released to the public for at least another 15 years.

Really?  Dr. King had "jump offs" in the Washington D.C. area?  If you've been to the D.C. area, you know that's probably not very difficult to believe on many levels.  In D.C., everyone has disciples and King is more charismatic than most.

And, we've heard all of this talk before and we've had some thoughtful and pointed discussions about all of this several years back when Ice Cube released his movie "Barbershop."

So, even if all of this is true, does this tarnish King's legacy?

For me, it doesn't.  It seems to me that we don't give ministers, pastors, clergy or people who are otherwise called to change the world, the space to be human.  While these people have made and are called to make great contributions to the world, they are, after all, working out their own salvation just like the rest of us.  I expect a certain amount of humanness from all humans, even the great ones.  Our trust and faith should be in Spirit, rather than in humans who can't help but fail each other on occasion.

So what if Mother Teresa was so disillusioned by the poverty she saw in her missions that she doubted the existence of God in letters?  Does it really matter that Abraham Lincoln's reasons for calling for an end of slavery had more to do with his desire a unified America than for equality?  Who cares if Lady Gaga has ulterior motives for giving a voice to communities that are marginalized and sometimes ignored?  And, what if King was a hustler who had jump offs?

That doesn't change the good they breathed into the universe.  That doesn't change a thing...at least not for me.

Now, let me know when Jon Huntsman gets a Nirvana quote right so we can start talking about some real issues.

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

Mid Week Meditation: The Christian Thing to do...

Every now and again my son catches me slipping...

Not too long ago, I was running an errand with my youngest son.  It was an errand that I did not want to perform, but I knew that I should because my conscious called on me to do so.  It was the right thing to do.  I cannot describe the details of the errand because, I don't want to put anything into the universe, internetdom or blogoshpere that may create conflict or strife with anyone.  (I know.  Somewhere, there's an avid Facebook user that's laughing at my attempt at discretion.  Facebook users who follow the blog, I promise to one day share the details in a "status" update and Tweet them as well for good measure.)  

So, as my son and I were leaving to complete the errand, I mumbled, "I don't want to do this."  I had my reasons for so mumbling. 

But my son heard me.  He only occasionally hears my demands to finish his piano practice, but this, he heard clearly.

And he called me on it.  "Dad," he said, "that's not the Christian thing to do."  That's what I get for forcing my son to attend a religious school--around the clock moralizing from a ten year old.  God bless him.   

And he was right on many levels...or perhaps wrongly right.  I would argue that doing the right thing for the wrong reasons, is uniquely Christian.  But, he called me on my comment nonetheless.

And it made me meditate about what is "the Christian thing to do?"

Certainly it is a good thing to do those things that are good and right.  The Scriptures support that just fine.  But, the Scriptures do not support doing the right thing for the wrong reasons or with the wrong heart. 

While there are many examples of this Apostle Paul's second letter to the church in Corinth seems to be squarely on point here:

"Each man should give what he has decided in his heart to give, not reluctantly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver."

Paul was speaking about tangible assets, but the point is clear.  The Christian thing to do is not only do the right thing, but do it with cheer.

I'm working on it.

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Joy and Happiness,,,

Disney World is billed as the "Happiest place on earth." It is so called because the place has a heaping amount of attractions and characters that are designed to make and keep us happy. And, it's called "the happiest place on earth" because the people who do public relations and marketing for Disney have done their homework.


They know we love to be happy. We love warm fuzzies, happy stuff and happy people; we love to be around it. That's why Disney has a commercial every year after the Super Bowl, in which they ask the winning quarterback what he's going to do after having won the Super Bowl. And naturally, we all know the answer: he invariably says that he's going to Disney World.

That's no mistake of course. A guy who is at the pinnacle of happiness who declares that he's going to a place to either continue the happy feeling or find a way to be even more happy by spending a few days at Disney World.

Happiness is great. Happiness is wonderful, until it's not. We can't be happy all the time. In a world where the average welfare recipient in the United States is better off financially than a super majority of the world, I know that I live a charmed life relatively speaking. But, even so, I can't always be happy. I have stresses. It is difficult to live in a world where there is so much oppression and poverty. That makes me pretty unhappy.

So, in the spiritual context, when we can't be happy, when happiness runs out, we have another Spirit-given principle we can connect with.

Naturally, it's joy. Our culture uses the terms happiness and joy interchangeably but, they are very different. Happiness is an emotion or inclination we have or feel in response to good fortune. When my portfolio has made gains in the stock market, I am happy. When I have the time to cook a meal, I am happy. When I can watch "Project Runway" or all is well at work and at home, I am happy. My happiness is contingent on good fortune.

Joy, is a tad different. It's not an emotion, but rather a sense of inner-wellness and an appeal to that which is righteous and sound externally. God and Spirit, at least according to the Scriptures, pours joy into us. If I am having a difficult day at work, I may not be happy, but I can be joyful. If "Project Runway" is not on, I may not be happy, but I can be joyful.

Spirit does not promise us happiness. But, Spirit does promise us joy. In the quiet moments, when we are not happy, when we are not in the "happiest place on earth," we can be joyful, and that will hold us until another happy time...or until the next season of "Project Runway."

Friday, September 16, 2011

A Word About Justice...





Yesterday was the anniversary of the 1963 bombing of the predominately African-American 16th Street Baptist Church in Birmingham, Alabama. 

While there has been great disagreement over just about everything related to the tragic incident, most serious observers agree that the bombing occurred in this manner:

In the very early hours of September 15th, 1963, four members of a sub-faction of the Ku Klux Klan planted a time-delayed bomb under the stairs of 16th Street Baptist Church.  At around 10:30a.m., about two dozen children of the church were in the basement of the church.  The bomb that was placed under the stairs exploded at that time, killed the young women pictured above (Denise McNair, Addie Mae Collins, Carole Robertson, and Cynthia Westley), and injured several others.

There is wide debate over the impact the bombing had on the civil rights movement and the passage of the the federal civil rights legislation in 1964.

Less disputed, however, are the well-documented difficulties southern and federal prosecutors had in prosecuting the individuals responsible for the bombing.  I think it is fair to say that, while some of the men responsible for the bombing were convicted of murder and sentenced to prison for lengthy terms, at least one and perhaps as many as five men who were involved in the planning and execution of the bombing, died before they were ever prosecuted for any offense related to the bombing.

In my discussions about the anniversary of the bombing, many people lamented about this fact.  They were appalled that there were men who participated in the planning or execution of the bombing who were never brought to "justice."  There were others who were adamant that the unprosecuted individuals would get justice from God. 

Naturally, as a prosecutor I get the need for us to want to see wrong doing and wrong doers "brought to justice."  I get that the elected and appointed officials (many obviously understood this desire for justice as well) spent decades, dollars and effort trying to find a way to punish the individuals responsible for the bombing. 

Its an innate need that we have.  Justice.  Its like our desire to see movies, or television sitcoms, or situations in our lives resolved with tidy, if not happy endings.  We like comeuppance if and because it brings balance to our affairs.

But what if we expanded our notion of justice?  What if we viewed justice as not only bringing punishment to an individual who has done us wrong, but also as a way to further peace and compassion.

Let me explain.  When Christ was killed, His followers could theoretically have sought justice in the traditional sense and sought to kill the authorities responsible or have them tried perhaps for a wrongful death.  But Christ's followers, created justice by spreading Christ's message of liberation, peace and love to the world.  That's justice.  I suppose that turned out okay.

As we contemplate the bombing, it is a noble work to find a way to prosecute those responsible for it. It is also as noble and worthy to use the bombing to continue the work of unity and equality the bombers tried to thwart. 

That would be justice as well.

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Mid-Week Meditation: Right or Righteous

Its been a long time, I shouldn't have left you and all that.  I apologize for my absence.  I have been busy creating a new work, and I will share all of that with you soon.  I promise to not leave for so long again.

But, not too long ago, friend of mine had a small disagreement with her partner.  They are the parents of an adorable, two-year-old daughter.  On one occasion,  they had a discussion about the proper amount of food to feed their daughter.  While the "experts" agree that children should eat one tablespoon of food for each year of age.  So, my friend's daughter should get two tablespoons of the several healthy things on her plate.

It was established that my friend was feeding her daughter a bit more than that.  My friend naturally felt guilty about this and was a little defensive when it was brought to her attention.

New parents, and I mean this earnestly, are beautiful.  They want to be the best parents they can be and will even take counsel from the "experts" even when the "experts" and their counsel isn't nearly as sound as common sense and mother wit.  Feeding a child too much is a very difficult thing for engaged parents to do.  My friend should not have felt the least bit defensive for feeding her daughter a bit more than the experts have suggested.

My friend's disagreement made me meditate on 1 Corinthians 8:1-13, the Apostle Paul's scolding of the church in Corinth.  In the passage,  Paul indicates that there are clearly rich and educated people in the church who are worshipping alongside poor, uneducated ones.

There was a religious practice in the city for non-Christians to place freshly cut meat on an altar as a sacrifice to some local deity and then after several days, allow humans to eat the meat.  Christians struggled with the ethics of eating meat that was placed on an altar for sacrifice to a local deity.

The educated members of the Christian community clearly thought that there were no problems with eating the meat, while the less educated members of the community believe it was sacrilegious to do so.  The educated members of the Christian community looked down on the less educated members of the Christian community because they held this belief.

Apostle Paul scolded the educated members of the church.  He told them that while they were technically correct that there were no ethical concerns that would bar Christians from eating the sacrificed meat, they were dividing the church because they were calling the uneducated members of the church stupid in essence.  Paul called on the educated members of the church to be loving and righteous rather than simply right.

Tuesday, July 5, 2011

We as humans made in the image of our Creator are blessed on earth.  We are on the top of the food chain.  We use and consume what ever we want on this earth.  We are free to roam the world and pursue every desire of our hearts.  This is a blessing.  God the eternal ruler of heaven and earth gave us earth as our domain.
God the father assigns beings their domain!  God has created us on this earth to rule over it in a similar way that he rules over the entire universe.  So essentially we are Gods of the earth.  God has let it be that if we will something with enough hard work and unity and faith in ourselves and in God we can execute our will on earth. 
Food for thought...  If hypothetically we as humans on earth decided it was imperative that we took all the water from all the seas and brought it to earths deserts.  Does anyone question that with enough hard work and unity faith in ourselves and faith in God we could accomplish a great feat like this.
As we study the word of God we can take from it how exactly to be a Great God and among the first things to take from it is the power of love.  Its interesting how the closer to God we become the more like God we become.
As Gods of the earth we have a duty to tend to the earth and its creatures.  We must unite, and roll up our sleeves and align our will with the will of God and go to work!  If we take on this perspective and this role issues like hunger war and poverty will be easy tasks to obliterate!  Be a God and take care of your duties!

                                                                     -Tony-

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Outrage for Outrage's Sake


The presidential election season hasn't quite begun in earnest, but I am getting prepared for it now the way the May 21sters were preparing for, you know, May 21st...only I'm not going to collect $18 million dollars a year from the people who are foolish enough to read or listen to me.

I am warning now, however, that the presidential political season will be particularly difficult to watch for people who hate ugliness and mudslinging.  This presidential season will be the most nasty, mean-spirited campaign seasons of all time.  There will be name calling.  There will be finger pointing.  There will be accusations of scandals, and the over-used anything "gate" attached to those scandals.  Strippers, illegitimate children, and black preachers with sermons taken out of context, will fall out of the woodwork.  And there will be race bating.

Some of you who have been around for a few years and have seen Willie Horton, seen what happened to the president in the last election--Hilliary essentially calling the president a coon because he actually won the South Carolina Primary, or GOP rank and file using "community organizing" and the president's middle name as code words for "really black"-- and ask how could an election season get much worse.

Yea, well, it already has.  A group called Turn Right USA has published an Internet ad (shown above simply because I can't describe in any manner that would do it any justice)  that essentially accuses Janice Hahn, a Democrat running for a California Congressional seat in an upcoming special election, of being in the pocket of street gangs.  The ad is so vile its funny.

And as of about 10 minutes ago the group has refused to apologize for the ad.  "We decided we would launch with a controversial ad that would piss a lot of people off," says Ladd Ehlinger, Jr., the creator of the ad, "If I get dinged a little, then so be it."
Fair enough.  I expect that.  I can't be outraged at people who reduce entire races of people to caricatures.  There will always be people to do that and that's obviously what the group was attempting to do.  But can we at least get an apology from the fellows who acted like the gang members in the ad?   There has to be better work out there for actors somewhere.

When the election season begins in earnest, don't say I didn't warn you.  Turn Right USA has just made the first move.

Monday, June 13, 2011

That's Me in the Corner, That's Me in the Spotlight...




I'm not a fan of either the Dallas Mavericks nor the Miami Heat for that matter, so I didn't have a horse in the race for the NBA Championships.

Last night, of course, in stunning fashion the Dallas Mavericks went on to win the championship.  As always, there will be plenty of talk about who the real stars of the championship series were and were not, who surprised and who disappointed their respective fans.

Lebron, Wade and Bosh have been ravaged by sports writers today.  The three have been called unready for the spotlight, unable to handle the pressure of a big game, and generally players with big salaries that are not commensurate with their talent. 

Dirk Nowitzki has made his way into the spotlight and is largely seen as a clutch player by those same writers.

I'm not sure about all of that.  Lebron, Wade and Bosh are all good players to be sure.  There are many players who didn't get the opportunity to play in the finals this year at all.  And while Dirk Nowitzki held it down for Dallas in the championship series, he has been an inconsistent player over the years by most accounts.

But all of this talk about "real stars" today and that we will no doubt hear and read all week, make me long for the days of my favorite basketball player, Kurt Rambis. 

Remember him?  He was a power forward who most notably played for the Los Angeles Lakers for about 10 seasons in the 1980s and 1990s.  The consummate underdog on the grind, Rambis played excellent defense, was an adept rebounder, had a field goal percentage of almost 60 percent and was considered an all-around team player.  He hustled and set up shots for Magic and James Worthy almost every night he played.  He was willing to box out, grind out, foul out and do the dirty work for his team that other players were not willing or unable to do.  It was a thankless role on a team full of big stars who history will remember.  But he won championships.

And he was a real star.

Sunday, June 12, 2011

"God is Dead" and Other Cool Stuff Hipsters Say...








Some time ago I was eating dinner with friends in a diner in the city in which I live.  It is a small neighborhood diner with both traditional greasy spoon and vegan options, so the people who frequent this diner are as  diverse any place I have seen.

My friends and I order food and it comes rather quickly.  We offer blessings over the food and begin eating and building when we hear a group of young hipsters building in the booth adjacent to us.

One of the young men in the group was waxing pompous and confident (God bless him, but is there any other way to wax?) about Nietzsche.  Rather, he was spouting off well-known, often-used Nietzsche quotes perhaps in an attempt to sound appropriately, but effortlessly well-read.  "Nietzsche said 'that which does not  kill us'..." and "Nietzsche said that 'all great things must first wear'..."  I gave him snaps for knowing that it was Nietzsche who actually said those things.  I have heard those quotes attributed to many, many other authors.

This scene was almost so ironic, it wasn't.

I love hipsters.  And its not just because of their skinny jeans, their retro gear, or their really cool lingo.  I mean really, if it were not for hipsters and their lingo ("dope," "fresh," and "I'm going to get my *insert any verb like run, or freak, or eat made to sound like an adjective here* on), how else would people of color know when their slang is outdated?

I love them because of their ability to make almost everything passe and uncool simply by saying that it is.  Even the sublime.   Even the things the rest of us degenerates think are kind of cool.  Like integration, gentrification, some jazz music, chastity and integrity.  Ask Coldplay, The Black Eyed Peas or Matt Lauer who are all victims of hipsters and their wrath about how this all works. 

In several of his writings and texts, Nietzsche made his now famous utterance, "God is Dead."  Of course, Nietzsche did not make this utterance because he believed in a God and that he killed that God.  We know that Nietzsche was a steadfast atheist.  Rather, Nietzsche meant that God as Christians understood the concept (as well as the God's underlying ethical system of virtue) was passe, out of style and "unworkable".

Nietzsche was perhaps the first hipster.  So, he may not have had the throw back Brewers' jersey and the slightly-bent trucker cap--the uniform of his hipster brethren, but he was able to make God--his arch enemy uncool, simply by saying that God was.

Wouldn't that be cool to banish things like poverty and oppression from our reality, simply by saying they are passe?  But, you know, if it were cool, then it would be uncool.

  

Tuesday, June 7, 2011

God and the Obese...

So, a friend sent me an article that cites a study, that in turn claims that almost fifty percent of children who attend religious services regularly, are obese.  Not just overweight, but obese.  The study also adds that a majority of adults who attend worship services regularly are in the same boat.

I had actually heard much of this study when it was published earlier this year.  The religious people I am close to, as well as many that I respect in theological circles, quickly dismissed the study.  And naturally, those folks who have had long-standing issues with organized religion, used the study as further indicia of the ills of worship.

At the outset, I acknowledge that the study is irresponsible.  Simply linking obesity with worship attendance frequency, is like linking strip club attendance with being an elected official.  I could have used a better comparison, but you get the point.  (I miss the days where our elected officials just had a few mistresses and womanized at strip clubs like everybody else, instead of sending pictures of their genitals over the Internet.  I digress.) 

It is irresponsible to say the least.  Without controlling for socioeconomic, educational, and other factors, the study does seem to be an attention grab by those who have a bone to pick with organized religion.

However, the church would be most wise to be pensive about the health of the pew.  Not for the study's sake, but for the future of the church.  In an age where a vast majority of African-American clergy die of heart disease or stroke or complications from diabetes by age 60, we know that while the study and its proponents have an agenda, there may be some truth in the findings somewhere.

Attending worship service certainly is refreshing for the mind and spirit, but it does less for the body.  A thoughtful spiritual plan pays attention to all three in a holistic sense.

If the Apostle Paul is right in his pronouncement to the church in Corinth that "we are the body of Christ," then "we" as individuals, and "we" as a church, the collective "we," should work to make healthier eating acceptable discourse in theology.

Thursday, June 2, 2011

Mid Week Meditation: Talents and Such

Every clergy who uses the preached word in their ministry, has a homily or sermon about Matthew 25:14-30.  

Of course, Matthew 25:14-30 is the well-known parable story of the talents.  Jesus tells the parable to His disciples on the Mount of Olives. In the biblical passage that precedes the talents parable, Christ has just compared the kingdom of heaven with ten virgins who went out to meet a bridegroom.


Jesus goes on in this parable to compare the Kingdom to a man who gave his servants talents. Talents are a unit of money roughly equal to a year’s wages of an average, on-the-grind blue-collar person. Jesus says that the Kingdom is like a man who leaves and gives three servants, five, two, and one talent respectively.

They all put their money to work and double it, except for the third one who buried his talent.

When the man returns, everybody settles their accounts with the man.  Servants one and two return the man’s talents with interest. He tells them “well, done good and faithful servant. You have been faithful over a few things, I will put you in charge over many.”

But the third servant, returned the one talent and tells the man why he does so. “You’re a hard man who reaps what he doesn’t sow. Here’s your talent.” The man of course calls the servant lazy and kicks him out into the darkness.

Now most clergy, particularly the "prosperity" gospel set, exeget the passage and make the first two servants the protagonists of the parable.  And, at first glance, it's not an unwise hermeneutic as a general proposition.  The first two servants did what they were asked, presumably, and returned the master's money with interest.  Sounds good, right?

I’m not saying that that interpretation of the Scripture is wrong, but what if the hero of the story is not the first servant or the second servant who doubled the talents, but what if the third servant was the hero?


Indulge me for a minute. To understand how and why Jesus wanted the third servant to be the hero of the parable, we have to understand a bit about the culture in first century Roman Empire.

There was an economic system in place that was very much like share cropping, slavery, payday loans or rent-to-own stores. Rich landlords owned thousands of acres of land and had a chosen few servants from the masses of people to work the land.

These servants would get land from the landlord and resources with steep interest rates (60% to 200%).  To turn a profit, the servants had to exploit their fellow poor brethren to do so and pass goods off at higher rates.

The people hearing Jesus’ parable would have run into people like the three servants everyday and would not have liked them very much.

We also know that the man—the rich man was not a parallel to God at all, he was a wicked man. He divided the servants mentally from the outset. First, simply by choosing them from the gentry created a distinction between them and the people not chosen to work the land. The land owner then gave them talents according to their abilities. That, is a further division. Jesus was one who believed in equality and giving equal shares to everybody.

Next, in order for the servants to double their money they would have had to put it in the same economic system that exploited the same people they loved and cared about. The first two servants do  do in fact carry out this system of usury, however the third servant does the admirable thing and takes the money out of circulation from the system. The scriptures certainly speaks against the kind of usury.

The rich man comes back and he collects his money with interest. “Well done, good and faithful servant…” this he says to create further separation and division between them and between them and the rest of the citizens.

And when the third servant talks, it is an indictment on and for the land owner.  The third servant is in essence, a whistle blower. He calls the land owner greedy for taking things he hasn’t worked for. The third servant even calls him hard and harsh.  He calls out the corrupt system knowing what the consequences might be for doing so.  The third servant would have been seen as the sober prudent individual, the one that stay the course and was the protagonist. He shames the land owner and the land owner, acknowledging all of his own bad traits, banishes the servant.

Perhaps we can use our talents to call out oppression and marginalization as well.